The Relationship Between PAR, CO₂, and VPD in Plant Growth

The Relationship Between PAR, CO₂, and VPD in Plant Growth

When I first started paying attention to light measurement for my plants, I focused almost exclusively on PAR — Photosynthetically Active Radiation, the amount of usable light plants receive in the 400–700 nm range. Over time, as I started experimenting with greenhouse crops and more controlled environments, I realized that light is only one piece of the puzzle. Two other factors — carbon dioxide (CO₂) and vapor pressure deficit (VPD) — interact with usable light in ways that make a significant difference in how plants grow.

That realization came not from a textbook but from measuring environments, watching upward trends plateau, and seeing plants respond differently even when PAR levels remained constant. I began to understand that PAR, CO₂, and VPD form a trio of conditions that together shape plant responses in productivity, leaf development, and overall vigor.

This article explains how these three factors interact, why they matter, and how everyday growers can use this understanding to make better decisions in lighting, ventilation, and placement.

What PAR, CO₂, and VPD Are

To set the stage, it helps to define these terms in practical, garden-tested language:

  • PAR (Photosynthetically Active Radiation) refers to the portion of light plants can use for photosynthesis, measured in micromoles per square meter per second (µmol/m²/s). PAR tells you usable light intensity at a moment.
  • CO₂ (Carbon Dioxide) is the carbon source plants draw from the air to build sugars during photosynthesis. Ambient CO₂ levels — usually around 400 ppm outdoors — can limit or support growth depending on conditions.
  • VPD (Vapor Pressure Deficit) describes the difference between the moisture in the air and the maximum moisture the air can hold at a given temperature. It’s a function of temperature and relative humidity. VPD influences how much water the plant transpires and how effectively it can use light and CO₂.

Each of these has its own measurement nuances and effects on plants, but their interaction is where practical growth outcomes start to make sense.

How PAR Drives Photosynthesis… But Only If CO₂ Is Available

When I first measured light for my tomatoes and peppers, I noticed something curious: increasing PAR — for example by raising PAR setpoints with supplemental lighting — drove leaf expansion and overall growth up to a point, and then the gains tapered off. The lights were brighter, but the plants were not more productive beyond certain levels. That’s where CO₂ became relevant.

Plants use carbon as building blocks for sugars and proteins produced during photosynthesis. PAR provides the energy to drive this process, but without sufficient CO₂, the photosynthetic machinery runs out of substrate. In my greenhouse trials, increasing ambient CO₂ by even a modest amount — for example by improving ventilation with a CO₂-enriched air intake or by preventing excessive CO₂ depletion in a closed room — allowed plants under the same PAR levels to maintain higher rates of growth longer into the light period.

This tells me that usable light intensity (PAR) sets the energy potential, but CO₂ availability often becomes the limiting factor when PAR is high. If PAR ramps up but CO₂ stays at background outdoor levels in a high-demand environment, photosynthesis can saturate and plant growth becomes less responsive to additional light.

VPD: The Hidden Bridge Between Light and Plant Physiology

Vapor pressure deficit — VPD — was the variable that took me the longest to wrap my head around because it is not intuitive like light or CO₂. Yet in practice it has dramatic effects.

VPD measures the drying power of the air. High VPD means the air can pull more water from leaf surfaces, increasing transpiration (water loss through leaves). Low VPD means the air is close to saturation, reducing transpiration.

Why does that matter for PAR and CO₂?

  • High transpiration rates (high VPD) can limit stomatal opening as the plant tries to conserve water. When stomata close partially, CO₂ uptake decreases — even if PAR is abundant. In my observations, plants under intense light with high VPD (hot and dry conditions) often slowed leaf expansion and looked “stressed” even when usable light and CO₂ levels seemed sufficient.
  • Low transpiration rates (low VPD) can make the air feel “gentle,” but if VPD is too low (very humid conditions), plants may not draw nutrients and water effectively through the transpiration stream. In those conditions, additional CO₂ does not translate into more photosynthesis because the physiological drivers are muted.

This helped me see VPD as a bridge between the external environment and plant response: it influences how fully stomata can open, which in turn affects both CO₂ uptake and the plant’s ability to use usable light energy efficiently.

Putting It Together: Practical Examples from the Garden

Here are some real scenarios I observed where the interaction between PAR, CO₂, and VPD became clear:

Case 1: Strong PAR + Normal CO₂ + High VPD
On hot summer afternoons when supplemental lights were also running near a greenhouse roof, PAR readings were high through midday. However, VPD was high (warm, dry air), and stomata began to close earlier than expected. The result: biomass accumulation did not match what PAR levels would predict. This happened even with CO₂ at typical ambient levels.

Lesson: High usable light does not guarantee higher growth when VPD driven stomatal closure limits CO₂ uptake.

Case 2: Moderate PAR + Elevated CO₂ + Balanced VPD
In early spring conditions with moderate PAR, I boosted ventilation to avoid CO₂ depletion and kept relative humidity controlled. VPD stayed in a balanced range. Under these conditions, plants developed fuller leaf canopies and steadier growth compared with winter scenarios with the same PAR but unbalanced humidity.

Lesson: Enhancing CO₂ availability and managing VPD can elevate growth even when light intensity is moderate.

What Everyday Growers Can Do

You don’t need a research greenhouse to put this knowledge into practice. Here are practical adjustments that helped me align PAR, CO₂, and VPD in everyday growing environments:

Optimize CO₂ Exposure

  • Avoid tightly closed environments where CO₂ can become depleted during strong solar or supplemental light periods.
  • If using supplemental lighting for extended hours, ensure airflow brings in fresh air with adequate CO₂.
  • In small indoor setups without CO₂ enrichment, periodic ventilation helps prevent stagnation and supports light use.

Balance VPD for Your Plants

  • Monitor temperature and relative humidity. Aim for conditions where VPD does not swing to extremes.
  • On hot, dry days with strong light, increasing humidity slightly or providing shading during peak heat can help keep stomata open longer.
  • In overly humid conditions, improve air circulation so that plants can transpire effectively.

Use PAR as a Guide, Not the Whole Story

  • Measure usable light and use it to position plants or schedule supplemental lighting.
  • If growth plateaus despite good PAR levels, consider whether CO₂ availability or VPD might be the limiting factor.

Together, these adjustments helped me maximize usable light’s impact on growth by aligning the physiological needs plants have for carbon gain and water transport.

Final Reflection

Understanding plant growth in terms of PAR, CO₂, and VPD transformed how I approach plant environments. Instead of treating light as an isolated variable, I began to see it as part of a system where carbon availability and atmospheric conditions shape how effectively plants can use that light.

PAR measures how much usable light is available. CO₂ supplies the carbon plants need to fix that light energy into sugars. VPD governs how the plant’s physiology opens the gateway to that process. Misalign any part of this triad, and growth becomes less predictable.

For everyday growers, this means thinking beyond “just more light.” It means looking at how light interacts with the air around your plants and how the plant itself responds to those combined conditions. Once I started thinking in those terms, my decisions about lighting, ventilation, and humidity made more sense and produced more consistent growth outcomes.

If you want plants that respond predictably to your care, focus not just on how much usable light they receive, but also on whether their environment supports CO₂ uptake and balanced gas exchange through VPD management.

View on Amazon

Amazon is a trademark of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.